ARTICLES  
   

 

 
Contents 1. "Fusing Fact and Fiction for Art's Sake,"a Daily Variety article by Brad Schreiber, looks at Hollywood's recent use and abuse of history.

2. "Biographical Sketches Revitalize Telepics World" by Brad Schreiber

 

 
Fusing Fact and Fiction for Art's Sake by Brad Schreiber
  Daily Variety, Feb. 20, 2002

Henry Ford said it is bunk. Napoleon said it is a set of lies, agreed upon. But history, as depicted in motion pictures, can revive interest in people and events which may otherwise remain generally overlooked.

In the recent past, screenwriter Akiva Goldsman won the Golden Globe award for his script about the schizophrenic, mathematical genius John Nash in A Beautiful Mind, based on the book by Sylvia Nasar. The biopic posed historical challenges, as Nash had in reality divorced his wife Alicia before returning to her, had a child out of wedlock and homosexual tendencies. Miramax Pictures allegedly participated in a campaign to discredit the accuracy of A Beautiful Mind, and by association, Universal.

But as Goldsman explained, "The architecture was really genius, madness, Nobel Prize." As for the enduring commitment between Nash and Alicia, he acknowledged, "They divorced, then they lived together for decades. Then, they remarried. So, the fact of John and Alicia is that they started married and ended married ... he was in Europe for a year. That's not the movie either, you know what I mean? There's certainly compression".

Perhaps Gregory Allan Howard had even more of a daunting task concerning economy of storytelling, as he is credited with the story and wrote the original draft for Ali, about one of the most recognizable people on the planet. "What I wrote was a father and son story," says Howard, one which concentrated on Muhammed Ali's life from age 12 to 40, as opposed to the decade covered in the film.

Howard prefers relying on interviewing to get at historical truth, a technique which proved quite effective when sixty interviews resulted in his script about a 1971 football team helping to integrate Alexandria, Virginia in Remember the Titans. He feels Hollywood generally fails at biopics. "If you have a true story, you should try to adhere to it above the 50 percent level, otherwise there is no point. You might as well just make everything up."

When Richard Eyre co-wrote and directed Iris, he knew that most viewers would not be familiar with author and philosopher Iris Murdoch, her battle with Alzheimer's disease or the book Elegy for Iris, which her husband, John Bayley wrote about their life together. The film depicts Murdoch both young and old, with the help of Kate Winslet and Dame Judy Dench. "I never saw it as a biographical picture," Eyre contends. "I saw it as a relationship and the story of the young and the old (Murdoch) was a necessary device ..."

Eyre elucidated Murdoch's views through a series of lectures in the film, but realizes that an emotional truth is often a substitute for an historical event. "I'm not being entirely facetious where I say certain elements of it are not biographically true, in the literal sense. You know, who knows what goes on in private in a marriage?"

As resident historian for the series History Vs. Hollywood on the History Channel, Steve Gillon gives Hollywood high marks on its recent biopics. "Historians have not been involved enough in using the opportunity of these historical films to engage the public in a larger debate about the events that are described in film." As an author specializing in post-New Deal America and a professor at the University of Oklahoma, Gillon has consulted on the History Channel's examination of films like The Patriot, U-571, 13 Days and their powerful two hour doc, The True Story of Black Hawk Down.

"The most difficult question a historian has to grapple with is causation, is what leads people to do the things they do ... when you take that 300 or 400 page book and try to turn it into a film that is dramatic and can reach a wide audience, you make further compromises to the complexity of the personality you can present."

Gillon, whose books include That's Not What We Meant to Do, examining legislation which achieved the opposite of its intended effect, lays out clearly the battle lines between historians and historical films: "I think historians have to understand the requirements of filmmaking, sort of the limitations...and the need and desire to reach a wider audience. And filmmakers also need to understand the importance of presenting as much as possible a portrait that's historically accurate."

 
Biographical Sketches Revitalize Telepic World by Brad Schreiber
 
Daily Variety, June 14, 2002

While network telepics have generally receded into the mists of time, there are still TV movies that can artistically compete with those of the silver screen.

 
TNT's "James Dean" seems one of the front-runners in the category this year, a nice successor to ABC's winning biopic last year, "Life With Judy Garland: Me and My Shadows."
 
The script for "James Dean," written by noted playwright Israel Horovitz, was a feature project for seven years, originally at Warners, before Turner Network Television decided to bring it to life. Finding an actor, outside of a then-too-young Leonardo DiCaprio, to play Dean was a dilemma, solved with a career-making performance by James Franco. And Horovitz's psychological insight into Dean's abandonment by his father became the fulcrum of the storyline.
 
"Why would a father ship his wife's body back on a train with an 8-year-old son, never go to the funeral and never pick the son up again, never bring the son back out to him?" Horovitz recalls of the ideas that helped fuel the creative process.
 
The train ride from Santa Monica to Indiana book-ends a unique chronology that Horovitz created, working with former Actors Studio cohort director Mark Rydell in a fashion Horovitz describes as "very invested." Their agreement to not work on the project if the right actor was not found suggests just that.
 
A cultural icon of an entirely different stripe, convicted killer Gary Gilmore, in 1997 was the first person in over a decade to be executed, by a firing squad no less. His brother, journalist Mikal Gilmore, wrote a searing, honest memoir that won the National Book Critics Circle award for biography and became HBO's "Shot in the Heart."
 
"I actually tried to keep myself out of the book as much as possible, until my place in the story became the narrative drive," explains Gilmore, played by Giovanni Ribisi, matched in onscreen charisma by Elias Koteas as older brother Gary. "I never saw it as about me. I saw the book as about family and I saw the central character as my father ... and the hero as my brother Frank."
 
"I know in a way Mikal's book was so popular, so you're actually responsible for the popularity of the book," says writer Frank Pugliese, who focused on the relationship of the two brothers, with flashbacks including the alcoholism and physical abuse that were a large part of the family dynamic.
 
Mikal praises the production for not settling for an ending with the ever-popular idea of closure, especially in such a dark tale. "The story is the consequence, the story is the aftermath ... that there are things that you have to live with that you cannot live with. ... And that the only grace that you're left with is memory and love and a kind of limited forgiveness."
 
Executive producer Tom Fontana was an essential element, having proved at adept at a gloves-off approach with "Oz," his HBO prison series that has upped the ante on dramatic shock value.
 
"One of the things I learned about with 'Oz' was that these are people who pay for this specifically so they're coming to it the way that people who go to the theater go to the theater. ... They're not like other television audiences," he says. "They seem to want this kind of intensity as opposed to backing away from it."
 
Audiences and critics demand a certain accuracy in historical feature films. But do cable and network biopics get held to the same standards of the truth and nothing but the truth?
 
Pulling no punches, Showtime's "The Day Reagan Was Shot" concentrated on the power vacuum that ensued after the assassination attempt on the life of the president. Writer-director Cyrus Nowrasteh exhaustively researched the event, producing a riveting portrait of Alexander Haig, played by Richard Dreyfuss, and the little-known fact that a medical student got past security into the hospital room of the president.
 
Nevertheless, Nowrasteh objects strongly to the concept of total accuracy for either feature or television films. "If we accept these standards, what are we going to do, take about a dozen of Shakespeare's historical plays and throw them out? There's a larger truth at work here in some of these historical adaptations or dramas that's more important than the accuracy of each incident."
 
Steve Gillon, University of Oklahoma history professor and resident historian for the History Channel, feels "The Day Reagan Was Shot" and "Shackleton" particularly capture an essence of history and character.
 
"Maybe because it's a smaller audience they're appealing to," he says, "but these television movies … do a much better job of dealing with personality and motivation and the complexity of human nature than do Hollywood movies, feature movies which present a very superficial and very monodimensional view of character and personality."